The defense secretary wanted a piece of history in his office, and his staff delivered it in pieces.
"Hegseth is no Ike. The globe won't give him Ike's attributes of humility, intellect, and judgment."
— Ty Seidule, retired brigadier general and former West Point history professor, to the Washington Post
The Washington Post published two photographs on Thursday. The first shows the fragments of a globe scattered on the blue hallway carpet of the Pentagon, beneath its wooden frame. The second shows an inches-wide gash in the bottom of the globe, its base punched through. The object in both photos is a 30-inch antique globe from the 1930s, one of two similar artifacts housed in the Pentagon, that Dwight D. Eisenhower is said to have used to plot the D-Day landings as supreme allied commander.
The artifact also briefly belonged to the ambitions of Pete Hegseth. The Post reported that the defense secretary took a liking to the globe and asked that it be placed in his office. Its historical significance, his staff understood, was "attractive." The move was arranged in February. The aides lost control of the artifact and dropped it. Eight months later, the photographs came out.
The Army conceded there was "an attempted move." "The spherical portion of the globe was detached from the metal mounting that allows it to rotate," a spokesperson said. One Post source described the moment the shell gave way: the aides dropped the globe, "sending the globe crashing on to its base and impaling the fragile shell near Antarctica." After the damage, the staff abandoned the relocation. The globe is being repaired. It is not in Hegseth's office.
The move, according to the Post, broke the one rule that mattered. Relocating historical items like the globe is normally "a deliberate process overseen by trained curators." Specialist movers are engaged. Crates are precision-built. Hegseth's staff skipped all of it. They did not wait for the experts. They decided to transport the artifact themselves, and a source blamed an "apparent lack of patience."
In 2022, a second Eisenhower globe moved between two army facilities in Alabama without incident. The company that did it, Craters & Freighters, documented the job on its own website: a protective crating designed and built to specification, weeks of planning, a team that treated the object as what it is. "Since the globe is considered priceless, we knew its value was much greater than financial," the company wrote.
That is the benchmark. A careful process overseen by people who know what they are moving takes months. Hegseth's staff did it in a day, and it cost an irreplaceable artifact a gash.
The reaction from critics of the secretary came fast and was unanimous on exactly one point: nobody was surprised the metaphor was there.
"They broke Eisenhower's globe because they didn't want to wait for a team of specialist historians to move it," wrote weapons systems expert John Ridge. "I cannot think of a more apt metaphor for Pete Hegseth's DoD." Tommy Vietor of Pod Save America called the incident "a perfect metaphor" for Hegseth's reign at the Pentagon, "stupid, impulsive, driven by vanity, and the result is destruction." Yale historian Joanne Freeman said the symbolism "is too much to bear," then supplied the part she thought the Pentagon had already decided: "And of course, they ignored the TRAINED EXPERTS WHO HANDLE HISTORICAL ITEMS. Because EDUCATION? EXPERTISE? WHO NEEDS IT?"
David Simon, the creator of The Wire, took the most generous reading available: the symbolism was so heavy-handed even for a Hollywood drama. "This metaphor is ridiculously obvious and unsubtle," he wrote. "Fire the writers. They're hacks." Drop Site's Ryan Grim noted that "Hegseth's frat brothers breaking Eisenhower's globe is a bit too on the nose."
Seidule, who taught history at West Point, went after the motive instead. It appears, he told the Post, that Hegseth "wants an Eisenhower totem to be like Ike, brilliant in war and peace." The totem, he said, will not do that job.
The official response is a small masterclass in damage control and, accidentally, in confession. A spokesperson for the "war department," as the Pentagon has rebranded itself since 2025, told the Guardian that "an accident occurred while staff were transporting a replica of the Eisenhower globe as part of its relocation." Accidents happen, the statement continued. "We are grateful no one was harmed, and the globe is being repaired. It is unsurprising that the Washington Post is once again dedicating time to another inconsequential non-story."
Note the word choices. The Post describes the artifact as priceless and as the globe Eisenhower used. The Pentagon's own statement calls it a replica. The department also declined the Post's requests to let its reporters inspect the globe in person; the photographs were obtained other ways.
Translation: when the artifact breaks, it becomes a replica, and when the story is inconvenient, it becomes a non-story.
The totem reading is not a stretch. The secretary has a well-documented fascination with the history of war and has boasted, since his confirmation in January 2025, of instilling a "warrior ethos" in the U.S. military. He oversaw the rebranding of the Pentagon into a war department. He was confirmed 51-49, a single vote that Vice President Vance cast as tiebreaker, the narrowest margin for a defense secretary in decades.
A man confirmed by one vote, who asks for a piece of the most celebrated general in American history to sit on his desk, is a man asking for something he knows he cannot be given. Command does not transfer. It was never in the globe.
The War Department says the globe is being repaired. The metaphor is already out in the world, and that is the part no one can repair. The secretary wanted history in his office, and history did what history does: it stayed where it was, cracked open.
The question was never whether his staff knew how to move a globe. The question is what a department that dropped an irreplaceable artifact and stayed silent for eight months thinks it can get away with, carrying everything else.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to speak up.
Join the Riot
Login with Google to leave a comment.
Login to Comment